You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of different methods and their results

From: UK monitoring and deposition of tephra from the May 2011 eruption of Grímsvötn, Iceland

Method Operator Grainsize Coverage Advantages Disadvantages Results
Tape-on-paper samples Public > 20 μ m 87 locations Wide coverage; quick and easy to analyse; ad-hoc network created quickly. No further analysis possible; effect of rain on tape unknown; possible local contamination. Tephra identified in Scotland on 23–24 May
Rainwater (tephra samples) Met Office (+ public) > 10 μ m 21 locations Can record grainsize and mass loading of wet and dry deposition; small additional cost to existing network; tephra can be analysed by SEM. Contamination by inorganic dust; difficult to identify smaller shards; detailed analysis is time consuming; possible contamination. Tephra possibly detected on 23–25 and 26–27 May with most confident identification north of 54°N.
Rainwater (chemistry) Public (via SEPA) n/a 47 locations Wide coverage; existing network used; easy to analyse. Doesn’t give mass loading or concentration; mainly useful for wet deposition. High Fe, Mn, Al concentrations in N. Scotland 23–25 May; no F or pH anomaly.
Pollen slides Met Office > 10 μ m (smaller in context) 2 locations Excellent constraint on timing; wet or dry deposition possible; small grains identifiable in context; potentially wide coverage. Standard petrographic methods difficult on stained slides, which are destroyed by further analysis; network operates in summer only. Tephra identified on 24–25 May (Eskdalemuir and Exeter) and 27 May (Eskdalemuir).
PM data AURN, SAQD, SEPA < 10 μ m 105 locations Wide coverage; excellent constraint on timing and near real-time results. High risk of contamination by local sources; wet deposition not detected. PM10 spikes at most locations in north and west UK on 23–24 May. Also elevated levels on 25–26 May in central Scotland.
Non-primary PM data AURN < 10 μ m 45 locations Good coverage; reduced risk of contamination by local sources. Requires simultaneous collection of PM10, PM2.5, NO X data; currently no real time analysis; wet deposition not detected. Tephra detected moving south from Aberdeen to N. England on 24 May.